Django 3 was released at the end of 2019, so I think it is high time I revisited my successful series of post about class-based views in Django. Those posts date back to 2013 and have been written with Django 1.5 in mind, and with examples from that code base. Now Django is already two versions older, but class-based views are still a big part of the framework, so I believe it makes sense to refresh the content of those posts. Moreover, I didn't have a chance to study Django 3 yet, so as per tradition of this blog, I will make my personal investigation available to everyone.
If you are a novice Python programmer, and just approached Django to start your career in web development, chances are that you were puzzled by many things, and class-based views (CBVs) are definitely among those. CBVs are apparently very easy to use, in the simple cases, but it might not be clear how to extend them to match more complicated use cases, as the development of a project proceeds. The official documentation is very good, but to master CBVs you need to understand object-oriented concepts like classes (well, obviously), delegation, and method overriding.
If you need to brush up on these concepts you might find useful to read the following posts here on the blog:
What are CBVs?¶
Class-based views are, Django views based on Python classes. This means that, to master them, you need to understand both Django views and Python classes, so let's give a quick definition of them.
A Django view is a piece of code that processes an incoming HTTP request and returns an HTTP response, nothing more, nothing less. A Python class is the implementation of the Object-Oriented concept of class in the Python language.
So, a view needs to be a callable, and this includes functions and classes. Thus, to understand the advantages of class-based views over function-based views we shall discuss the merits of classes over functions. The latter sentence could be the title of a 10 volumes book on programming (followed by another 10 volumes book titled "Merits of functions over classes"), so I am just going to scratch the surface of the matter here. If you want to dig more into the subject, please read the series on Python 3 OOP that I linked above, where you will find all the gory details that you are craving for.
Starting off with Python classes¶
The main point classes is to implement encapsulation: they represent a way of coupling data and functions. Doing this, a class loses the dynamic essence of a procedure, which exists only while it is running, and becomes a living entity, something that sits there, caring for its data, and reacts when we call its functions (methods).
A good analogy for a class is a finite-state machine: once the class has been initialized, methods are what we use to make the machine move between states. If we do not call methods, the class simply waits there without complaining.
As an example, let's look at a very simple procedure that extracts the even numbers from an iterable like a list
def extract_even_numbers(alist): return [i for i in alist if i%2 == 0]
The example is very trivial, but, as code naturally tends to become more complicated, it's better to start with simple examples. A class version of this function could be written as
class EvenExtractor: def __init__(self, alist): self.l = alist def extract(self): return [i for i in self.l if i%2 == 0]
The two are very similar, and it might look like we haven't changed anything. Indeed, the difference is subtle but remarkable. Now the
EvenExtractor class has two parts, the first being the initialization and the second being the actual extraction, and we can have the class in one of three states: before initialization (
EvenExtractor), after initialization (
e = EvenExtractor([1,4,5,7,12])), and after extraction (
l = e.extract()).
Converting the procedure to a class, then, we obtained a rich tool that can execute its job step by step and, in general, can work in a non linear way, as we might add further methods, and thus more states.
Delegation is the key¶
The real power of classes used as finite-state machines lies in the concept of delegation. This is a mechanism through which a class can delegate some work to another class, avoiding to duplicate code, and thus favouring code reuse and generalisation.
(You might notice that I don't mention inheritance, but delegation, which is implemented by both composition and inheritance. I am a strong supporter of an OO design principle that states "Favour composition over inheritance". I keep reading too many introductions to object-oriented that stress too much the inheritance mechanism and leave composition aside, raising a generation of OOP programmers that, instead of building systems populated by many small collaborating objects, create nightmares infested by giant all-purpose things that sometimes resemble more an operating system than a system component.)
Let's continue the above example, improving the
__init__ method of the
class EvenExtractor: def __init__(self, alist): self.l = [int(elem) for elem in alist] def extract(self): return [i for i in self.l if i%2 == 0]
Now the class performs an important action in its initialization phase, converting all elements of the input to integers. Some days after this change, however, we might realise that we could also profitably use a class that extracts odd elements from a list. Being responsible object oriented programmers we write
class OddExtractor(EvenExtractor): def extract(self): return [i for i in self.l if i%2 != 0]
and call it a day. Through the inheritance mechanism expressed by that
(EvenExtractor) signature of the new class, we first defined something that is exactly the same thing as
EvenExtractor, with the same methods and attributes, but with a different name. Then we changed the behaviour of the new class but only for the extraction part by overriding the method.
To summarise the lesson: using classes and delegation you can build finite-state machines that are easily customizable to suit your exact needs. This obviously is just one of the many points of view under which you can consider classes, but it is the one we need to understand Django CBVs.
Back to Django¶
Let's start discussing a practical use of what we learned so far, reviewing how Django uses Python classes and delegation to provide views.
A Django view is a perfect example of a finite-state machine. It takes an incoming request and makes it flow through different processing steps until a final response is produced, which is then sent back to the user. CBVs are a way for the programmer to write their views leveraging the object-oriented paradigm. In this context Class-based Generic Views are the "batteries included" of Django views, the building blocks that the framework provides out of the box.
Let's dig into one of the examples of the official Django docs; here you find the API of the beloved
ListView, a generic view to deal with a list of things (extracted from the database). I slightly simplified the example provided by the documentation to avoid having too much on our plate.
from django.views.generic.list import ListView from articles.models import Article class ArticleListView(ListView): model = Article
This example assumes that
articles is your application and
Article is one of its models.
You can see here the full power of inheritance. We just derived
ListView, and changed the
model class attribute. How can this work? How can this class process incoming requests and what are the outputs? The official documentation states "While this view is executing,
object_list will contain the list of objects (usually, but not necessarily a queryset) that the view is operating upon."; this leaves many dark corners, however, and if you are a novice, chances are that you are already lost.
ArticleListView derives from
ListView, the latter is the class we have to analyse to understand how incoming data is processed. To do this you need to look at the documentation, and if something is still unclear you can freely look at the source code. In the following paragraphs I will summarise what happens when Django calls the sample
ArticleListView class shown above, and you will find links called "DOCS" for the official documentation, and "CODE" for the relevant source code, if you want to read it by yourself.
URL dispatchers and views¶
A CBV cannot directly be used in your URL dispatcher; instead you have to give the result of the
as_view method (CODE), which defines a function that instances the class (CODE) and calls the
dispatch method (CODE); then the function is returned (CODE) to be used in the URL dispatcher. As a user, we are interested only in the fact that the entry point of the class (the method called when a request hits the URL linked with it) is
Let's use this knowledge to print out a string on the console each time a request is served by our CBV. I will run through this simple task step by step, since it shows exactly how you have to deal with CBVs when solving real problems.
If we define the
ArticleListView class this way
from django.views.generic.list import ListView from articles.models import Article class ArticleListView(ListView): model = Article def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs): return super().dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs)
the class does not change its behaviour. What we did was to override the
dispatch method with a call to the parent's method, i.e. we explicitly wrote what Python does by default. You can find detailed information about
super in the official documentation and in this post on the blog. Please be sure you understand the star and double star notation to define variable number of arguments; the official documentation is here.
Since views are automatically called by the framework, the latter expects them to comply with a very specific API, so when overriding a method you have to provide the same signature of the original one. The signature of
dispatch can be found here.
dispatch method receives a
request argument, which type is
HttpRequest (documentation), so we can print it on the console with the standard
from django.views.generic.list import ListView from articles.models import Article class ArticleListView(ListView): model = Article def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs): print(request) return super().dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs)
This prints the content of the
request object on the standard output of the server that is running the Django project. If you are running the Django development server, you will find the output on the text console where you issued the command
python manage.py runserver.
This, in a nutshell, is the standard way of dealing with Django CBGVs: inherit from a predefined class, identify which methods you need to change, override them complying with their signature and calling the parent's code somewhere in the new code.
The full list of methods
ListView uses when processing incoming requests is listed on its official documentation page in the "Method Flowchart" section; in the "Ancestors (MRO)" section you can see that
ListView inherits from a good number of other classes. MRO stands for Method Resolution Order and has to deal with multiple inheritance: if you are eager to deal with one of the most intricate Python topics feel free to read this.
Incoming GET requests¶
Back to our
dispatch method of the parent reads the
method attribute of the
request object and selects a handler to process the request itself (CODE): this means that if
'GET', which is the HTTP way to say that we are reading a resource,
dispatch will call the
get method of the class.
get method of
ListView comes from its
BaseListView ancestor (DOCS, CODE). As you can see, the function basically initializes the attribute
object_list with the result of the call
get_queryset(), creates a context calling the method
get_context_data and calls
Are you still with me? Don't give up, we are almost done, at least with ListView. The method
get_queryset comes from the
MultipleObjectMixin ancestor of
ListView (DOCS, CODE) and simply gets all objects of a given model (CODE) running
queryset = self.model._default_manager.all(). The value of
model is what we configured in our class when we wrote
model = Article. I hope at this point something start to make sense in your head.
That's all, actually. Our
ArticleListView class extracts all
Article objects from the database, and calls a template passing a context that contains a single variable,
object_list, instanced with the list of extracted objects.
Templates and contexts¶
Are you satisfied? I'm actually still curious about the template and the context. Let's see what we can find about these topics. First of all, when the class calls
render_to_response it uses the code that comes from its
TemplateResponseMixin ancestor (DOCS, CODE); the method initialises the class
TemplateResponse passing a template and a context. The template, through a series of calls which you can follow by yourself, comes from
template_name (CODE); while
TemplateResponseMixin initializes it as
ListView performs some magic tricks through ancestors (CODE) to return a template which name derives from the given model. In short, our
ArticleListView, defining an
Article model, automatically uses a template that is called
May we change this behaviour? Of course! This is, after all, the point of using classes instead of functions: easily customisable behaviour. We can change the definition of our class to be
from django.views.generic.list import ListView from articles.models import Article class ArticleListView(ListView): model = Article template_name = 'sometemplate.html'
Let's review what this does step by step. When the response is created, Django runs the code of
render_to_response (CODE), which in turn calls
get_template_names. Pay attention that this method returns a list of names, as Django will use the first available among them, scanning them in order. This method is overridden in
ListView by its superclass
MultipleObjectTemplateResponseMixin (CODE). This calls the same method of its own superclass
TemplateResponseMixin (CODE), which returns the attribute we set in the
ArticleListView class (CODE). The mixing goes on and appends to the list the template file name derived from the model (CODE) and finally returns the list, which at this point is
As for the context, remember that it is only a dictionary of values you want to be able to access when compiling the template. Variable names inside the context, data format, and data content are completely up to you. When using CBGVs, however, you will find in your context some variables that have been created by the ancestors of your view, as happens for
object_list. What if you want to show a page with the list of all articles, but you want to add a value to the context?
Easy task: you just need to override the function that produces the context and change its behaviour. Say, for example, that we want to show the number of total readers of our site, along with the list of articles. Assuming that a
Reader model is available we can write
from django.views.generic.list import ListView from articles.models import Article, Reader class ArticleListView(ListView): model = Article def get_context_data(self, **kwargs): context = super().get_context_data(**kwargs) context['readers'] = Reader.objects.count() return context
As always, when overriding a method we need to ask ourselves if we need to call the original method. In this case, we want to merely augment the content of the context and not replace it, so we call
super().get_context_data(**kwargs) first, and we add the value that we need to that. pay attention that this might not be always the case, as it depends on the logic of your override.
In this first post I tried to uncover some of the mysteries behind CBVs and CBGVs in Django, showing exactly what happens to a GET request that hits a class-based view. Hopefully the matter has now been demystified a little! In the next posts I will discuss
DetailView, the generic view to show detail about an object, how to create custom CBVs, and how to use CBVs to process forms, i.e. accept POST requests.
2020-03-12: A global review of the post, which has been updated with the latest Django code (3.0)
2013-10-29: As pointed out by mbrochh on Reddit, there is a very useful resource for Django programmers: Classy Class-Based Views. It is a comprensive index of all CBGVs with ancestors and method signatures. Make sure to have it in you Django bookmarks!
2013-10-29: I fixed a couple of typos when overriding
dispatch(). Thanks to Tom Evans for spotting them.
2013-10-30: Fixed the
__init__() method of
EvenExtractor, that was missing the
self parameter. Thanks meatypocket.
2015-06-10: meatypocket spotted a missing
return in the
dispatch() override. Thank you!